Skip to main content

Featured

The Monty Hall problem explained

The Monty Hall problem is a classic probability puzzle that has puzzled mathematicians and game show contestants for decades. The problem is based on a game show called Let's Make a Deal, hosted by Monty Hall, which was popular in the 1960s and 1970s. The problem has become famous because it is counterintuitive and seemingly goes against our common sense understanding of probability. The problem is presented as follows: You are a contestant on a game show, and there are three doors in front of you. Behind one of the doors is a valuable prize, such as a car, and behind the other two doors are goats. You are asked to choose one of the three doors, and after you have made your choice, Monty Hall, the host, opens one of the other two doors to reveal a goat. He then asks you if you want to switch your choice to the remaining door or stick with your original choice. What should you do? At first glance, it may seem that the probability of winning the prize is 1 in 3, and there

From Plagiarism to Mass Genocide - Divyansh


artificial intelligence (AI) continues to advance, there have been growing concerns about its potential misuse, particularly in relation to plagiarism. One of the leading AI research organizations, OpenAI, has been at the forefront of the debate on this issue.

Open AI

OpenAI was founded in 2015 by a group of tech luminaries, including Elon Musk and Sam Altman, with the goal of advancing AI in a responsible and beneficial way. However, the organization has also been vocal about the potential risks associated with AI, including the possibility of it being used for nefarious purposes like plagiarism

One of the key concerns with AI and plagiarism is that AI can be used to generate high-quality content at scale, which can be difficult to distinguish from original work. This has the potential to make it easier for individuals and organizations to commit plagiarism without getting caught.

AI developers has been working on developing tools and techniques to detect and prevent AI-generated plagiarism. One of the approaches they have taken is to create an AI system that can detect whether a given text is likely to have been generated by another AI system. This can help to identify cases where AI-generated content is being used inappropriately.

Another approach that OpenAI is exploring is to make AI-generated content more distinguishable from human-generated content. This could involve adding specific markers or indicators to AI-generated content that would make it clear that it was not created by a human.

TECH WARS

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been a hot topic among big tech companies for several years, with many investing heavily in the development of advanced AI systems. However, as the competition heats up, concerns have been raised about the potential misuse of AI, particularly in relation to intellectual property.
The war between big tech companies over AI is intensifying, with each company vying for dominance in the field. Some critics have argued that this competition could lead to a race to the bottom, with companies cutting corners and engaging in unethical practices to gain an edge over their competitors.

Conclusion

AI could be harmful for creativity as we will no longer be using our brain to do creative or innovative tasks, and the brain would hence stop developing as it would no longer be needed to develop or solve problems.All the solutions would just be a click away . AI has access to a limited amount of data created by humans But on a long term basis, when we'll be so dependent on ai the human production of knowledge will stop, and bots will also not be able to sustain or gain more information through us We'll be stuck in a trap created by humans.

After a long time, we couldn't resist computers as it would be like electricity to us now.Everything would be functioning through it.

If we accidentally ever create an AI with the ability to create new ideas and develop them on its own without human interference, the end of humanity would be just a step closer. AI would no longer need humans.And in a short span of time, AI would be comparatively more intelligent than us humans, and maybe humans could become just another obstacle in the way of its task, and a mass genocide would be the most conventional solution. We did the same with animals; once we were the animals, and then we evolved to the point of killing them for our own needs and wants.The only solution we have is to use the AI-based facilities to limit and prioritise human brain development.In case of an emergency, AI may as well be treated like a nuclear object.The smallest decisions we take today can determine our future from a long-term perspective.

- Scientrust, Divyansh , Sarth Priyadarshi 



Comments

Popular Posts